Skip to main content

Services

Legal Technology Development Built for Confidentiality

Software for law firms and legal operations teams. Designed for privilege protection, ethical walls, and the scrutiny that legal environments demand.

Legal Software Has Different Requirements

Attorney-client privilege is not a feature you add after launch. Ethical walls are not optional configuration. Client data segregation is a professional obligation, not a preference.

Most general-purpose software development doesn't account for these requirements. Legal technology requires data isolation between matters, access controls that enforce ethical boundaries, and audit logs that can withstand review by bar committees, opposing counsel, or courts. We design software with those requirements as constraints from the beginning.

What We Build

  • AI-assisted legal research and document review — Retrieval systems that search your firm's documents with matter-level access controls and attorney oversight workflows
  • Contract analysis and drafting tools — Clause extraction, comparison, and drafting assistance with source attribution and human review built in
  • Client and matter management — Secure platforms for managing client relationships, matters, and documents with access controls that enforce ethical obligations
  • Internal knowledge bases — Searchable repositories of precedents, briefs, and institutional knowledge with role-based permissions and privilege protection
  • Due diligence automation — Document processing pipelines with exception flagging, verification workflows, and comprehensive audit trails
  • Secure client-facing portals — Encrypted communication and document sharing with clients, built for confidentiality requirements

Our Approach to Legal Technology

Privilege as a design constraint. Every system we build for legal clients treats privilege protection as a hard requirement. Data is segregated by matter. Access controls enforce who can see what. AI systems retrieve from matter-specific contexts, not shared data pools.

Ethical walls by default. Practice group isolation and matter-level restrictions are built into the access control architecture—not implemented as manual administrative processes that rely on someone remembering to configure them.

Attribution for AI-assisted work. When AI assists with legal work, the system maintains clear attribution—what AI contributed, what sources were cited, what the attorney reviewed and approved. Audit trails exist to support professional responsibility obligations.

No SaaS shortcuts. Law firms need to control their data. We build systems firms own and operate, with infrastructure that keeps client data within your security perimeter.

Frequently Asked Questions

How do you enforce ethical walls in software?

Ethical walls are implemented at the data and access control layer—not just the UI. Matter-level access restrictions are enforced in the backend so that even if someone navigates to a restricted matter, the system will not return restricted data. We work with your conflicts and compliance team to map out required restrictions and implement them as technical controls.

What document management systems do you integrate with?

We integrate with iManage, NetDocuments, SharePoint, and other common legal document management platforms. We also work with practice management systems, billing platforms, and e-discovery tools. Integration scope and approach depend on your specific systems—we assess these requirements early in the engagement.

Can AI-generated legal work product be ethically used?

AI-assisted legal work is an evolving area of professional responsibility. We design systems that support attorney oversight as a mandatory step—AI assists with research, drafting, and analysis, but human review is built into the workflow. Our systems maintain attribution and audit logs that help attorneys satisfy their supervisory obligations and demonstrate reasonable care.

Do you build for solo practitioners or large firms?

Both, with different architecture and cost profiles. Smaller firms often need SaaS-based solutions with lower infrastructure overhead. Larger firms typically need private deployment with more complex access control requirements and integration points. We scope engagements based on your firm's size, data sensitivity, and existing technology environment.

Get started

Request a Legal Tech Assessment

Describe your practice management challenges, confidentiality requirements, and automation goals. We will follow up within one business day.

Include context about your industry, systems, or compliance requirements if relevant.

We respond within one business day. No sales pressure — just a focused technical conversation.

By submitting this form, you agree to our privacy policy. We will never share your information with third parties.